Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
I think, therefore I am thinking.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


           

Citation-Like Commenting

 Argue In Place
  (+2, -1)
(+2, -1) 		  [vote for,
against]

This idea, applicable primarily to large ideas with voluminous and occasionally lengthy annotations, and perhaps not only to the Halfbakery, is to use something akin to a citation based system to be able to comment on text directly where it occurs(as opposed to re-quoting it 5 scroll pages later).

This shouldn't eliminate the more linear flow of consciousness display of text, but improve the readability of comment flow.

—theircompetitor, Dec 17 2013

comment threading http://en.wikipedia...versation_threading
[xaviergisz, Dec 18 2013]

Please log in.
If you're not logged in, you can see what this page looks like, but you will not be able to add anything.
Short name, e.g., Bob's Coffee
Destination URL. E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)






       This would tend to strongly bias the HB in such a way that it would be significantly less accesible and comprehensible to proles, but much more comfortable for a minority of pedantic, clasically trained academics.   

       What's not to like ? [+]
—8th of 7, Dec 17 2013
   

       I was thinking this would be like traffic citations?   

       Ahem "Citation: 20/12/2013. 9:32 AM The defendant did willfully, and with malice aforethought, post a long idea without paragraph breaks".   

       I'm guessing Interpol has better things to do than chase these up.
—not_morrison_rm, Dec 17 2013
   

       This was actually much more the vision of how the internet would work of early pre-internet visionaries such as Vannevar Bush than how the internet actually turned out.
—hippo, Dec 18 2013
   

       If I choose to place an annotation right at the very beginning of the post- an annotation/citation which is unnecessarily long, rambling and full of what I consider to be witty digressions - would that not break up the original idea to the point of incomprehensibility?
—bungston, Dec 18 2013
   


 

back: main index
business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle