h a l f b a k e r yIt's not a thing. It will be a thing.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
The only downside to doing something like that is compatability issues. Not everyone has or will ever have a CD writer on their computer. Secondly not every computer will be able to read a rewriteable CD. |
|
|
And manufacturing issues. It's highly likely that making the entire thing CDRW will be much less expensive. |
|
|
Well, since both typos that I found on a quick read of this one were do to a missing "r", I'll just suggest that you check your keyboard. After all, "Re-Coding" is different than "Recording". (Do a search for "diver" and you'll find the other one.) |
|
|
Anyway, I love this idea because of it's concept. Being able to keep source CDs current would be a great thing. However, the actual technology that is suggested here is a little bit misguided I think. |
|
|
First of all, mass produced cd's are stamped, not burned, and as a result they use a different material than recordable ones. |
|
|
As [Worldgineer] says, making it all a CDRW is likely to be a worthwhile move (at least as far as the material is concerned.) |
|
|
I think if you just stamped cd's using a material that's re-writable, you'd have it. You just use the cd-writer's firmware to manage the thing as time goes by. |
|
|
//Not everyone has or will ever have a CD writer on their computer.// I love statements like that. The same thing used to be said about "Hard Drives". After all, 640K should be enough for everyone. |
|
|
It doesn't matter if someone has a cd writer or not they would just use the disk like a plain ROM disk. Making it all CDRW would cost more I think since CDRW have to be burned and not stamped. The stamped part would contain the orginal driver and software the R/W part would be blank and only be used to hold the updated software. Are they even making CD drives that can't read R/W CD's any more? |
|
|
I don't see any reason why a CDRW can't be stamped... do you know something I don't know about? |
|
|
I'm thinking of rewriteable disk. I believe that they work with a dye or phase change material not actual holes in the media. |
|
|
how about a 2 sided disk. The OEM side would be a stamped CD and the other side would be rewriteable |
|
|
It's all about volume. Sure, you could make a dual disc, but it would cost you $$$$. To get reasonable pricing, your volume would have to be VERY LARGE (10s of millions, at least.) |
|
|
Interest AOL in your format, reduce the number of obsolete AOL discs out there, and maybe you'll have something. |
|
|
// how about a 2 sided disk. The OEM side would be a stamped CD and the other side would be rewriteable // |
|
|
That's a great idea - for all kinds of applications, musical and data. |
|
|
//The OEM side would be a stamped CD and the other side would be rewriteable // |
|
|
...and last side would be the one with the label... |
|
|
Actually, a small area could be reserved for labelling, in the centre region. |
|
|
Why not just burn yourself a "master" driver CD with all of the latest drivers periodically. Blank CD's are cheap enough that you can just trash them as you update them. |
|
|
It's the sense of waste. Only a few bits change, yet you have to throw the whole 680 Mb away. This is a way to change just those bits that change. |
|
|
Just how do you decide on the RO/RW ratio? |
|
| |