h a l f b a k e r yIdea vs. Ego
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Lots of problems lately have been solved by throwing ginormous mounds of money onto them. I propose that a similar approach might be used to settle the problem of Gaza. Not that many people live in Gaza - wikipedia says 1.5 million. I propose that each and every person in Gaza be given $5000 and an
offer to resettle somewhere far from Gaza. This would cost 7.5 billion if each one took the offer and would render families pretty flush with cash. That is much cheaper than bailing out AIG and probably equals the status quo cost of a few military expeditions and continuing UN subsidies.
Emigration locations could be anywhere. As is usually the case with mass immigrations, the locations would be those happy to accept folks flush with cash and the new immigrants would form enclaves. I could imagine HIV-depleted areas of Botswana, population-poor regions of former soviet republics, or Japan, or Detroit as possible sites for these immigrants.
Now would be an especially good time for such an endeavor, since the Gazans are powerfully motivated to leave.
Removing Gazans from Gaza by offering them a better alternative would be humane and effective, and end the conflict by emptying the region. One might then refill it with refugees from other regions who are currently stuck in camps, since there is nothing wrong with Gaza as a piece of property except it has been kicked around a bit. I am sure these refugees would be happy to do the jobs in Israel that Gazans used to do.
Everyone wins.
The buyout begins.
http://edition.cnn....02/mideast.clinton/
Glad I could help. [bungston, Mar 02 2009]
A long cherished door key.
http://msnbcmedia.m...01.photoblog900.jpg
If you think that Palestinians will be happy to give up their homes in return for re-settlement & a measly $5,000, you are very mistaken. [DrBob, Jul 22 2014]
[link]
|
| |
$5000 per person is not what I'd call flush with cash. I think something like $500,000 per person would be a fairer figure. |
|
| |
//Lots of problems lately have been solved by throwing ginormous mounds of money onto them// - "solved" may be a little optimistic. |
|
| |
Mass resettlement is what caused the problems, I'm not optimistic about solving them in the same way. |
|
| |
We could always outlaw religion throughout the planet. I'm sure that would work. |
|
| |
Thanks for the laugh, bungie. + |
|
| |
I like your choices of location, Botswana, empty areas of Russia, Japan (all full) or Detroit. |
|
| |
Even if I ideologically supported this, many Gazans won't take it, if they wanted to leave they probably would have some time in the last 40 years. |
|
| |
Maybe the Gazans could swap en masse with the Central Americans who are sending their kids to the US to escape gangs. Fresh starts - everyone wins! |
|
| |
1. Calloused and durable Gazans are used to the Israelis. They will make short shrift out of a bunch of third rate gangsters in Honduras. |
|
| |
2. Central American emigrants will be less inclined to make war and more inclined to accept benign despotic rule by Israelis. |
|
| |
I'm not sure better gangsters will help... |
|
| |
Sadly, all Christians and Jews already opted for that
solution, the Christians with no compensation and
the Jews forced to comply. |
|
| |
I think a better solution would be to put Retalin in
the drinking water, and make everybody in our
region start thinking focused, wanting to live, and
advancing community life, multi-culture and
cooperation, inviting back all the expelled and
refuge peoples. There was more than enough money
poured into the region for that to be accomplished. |
|
| |
Oh, and while watching the Gaza conflict, 600(!!)
Syrian people were killed this week by ISIS. |
|
| |
I was really hoping for the Apartheid argument to
pick up steam, not because I think it's much like
Apartheid, but could have potentially changed the
global discourse from the zealotry of religious
sectarianism to the much more easily managed
comparable paradise of interracial conflict. Of
course Apartheid is part of and partly the legacy of
another religious sect completely unrelated to any
involved in the Israeli conflict; except USA and
Great Britain. So it's possible an Apartheid
argument might be bridged through those
connections. However, because Apartheid was
really about a segregated social vision rather than
the establishment of a jewish holy land they can
be differentiated by their 'ideological' ends
despite unfortunately similar 'segregationist'
means. Nevertheless, when this topic was
broached by Kerry in his recent PR nightmare,
compelled me for a moment to think he saw a
possibility to recontextualize into discoursive
trajectory that would be a) relevant to him as an
Irish american, b) broaden the scope of the
problem instead of narrowing it on Israel c)
possibly create peace and stability through racial
integration faster than the current discourse
which only multiplies difference. |
|
| |
[bungston], I take back all those things I said about you
behind your back (apart from the one about the sheep).
This is a brilliant idea. [+] |
|
| |
Financially, even $100bn to solve this festering wound
would be cheap. |
|
| |
I like it because it plays to people's selfish side, which
means it would probably work. And, unlike a forced
resettlement, the emigrees would have no moral high-
ground from which to fight back. It would at least solve
the problem for a generation, until their grandchildren
(who never saw the money) rebel against their
grandparents' sell-out. Therefore, it might be necessary
to make payments at two-generation intervals to keep
people away. Still cheap at twice the price. |
|
| |
There would, no doubt, be a minority who would hold out
against the offer. The trick, therefore, would be to make
the offer contingent on 99.9% of all people accepting it.
That would put enormous pressure on the few hold-outs. |
|
| |
It's beyond discussion. Perhaps if we forcibly relocate everyone in Israel to
Brazil and everyone in the immediately surrounding area to, say, France and
then allow only atheists to settle the area it will stop the war. |
|
| |
Sort of went through there on the bus in 1992, mighty pretty piece of Mediterranean beachside....sure at some point it'll all be holiday time-shares at some point.. |
|
| |
Particularly liked the use of cactus instead of wire fences, very green solution. |
|
| |