h a l f b a k e r yThe embarrassing drunkard uncle of invention.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
tentative plus! be wary with your emails. |
|
|
see my lengthy, incredibly amusing, witty, thought
provoking, inspiring, detailed commentary link about this
idea....where is it ? not on my Bcc list then ! + |
|
|
Then you know that the UI must have been really badly designed. |
|
|
Often I have sent the email, then forwarded it to who should have been Bcc:, and then added some other comments! Perhaps an 'expanding' Bcc would avoid errors? |
|
|
//What if you get them mixed up?// |
|
|
My sentiments exactly. If I had to blind copy someone, chances are that I have either discussed the email with them previously or I sent them a separate message. I would hate the embarassment of sending the secret message to everyone thinking it just went to my BCC recipients. |
|
|
I am boning this. A blind carbon copy should be exactly that, an exact copy of the message sent to someone not on the internal distibution list. No more. Send a separate message if you want to comment on the other message. |
|
|
Not at all. The real world analogy - blind carbon copies - routinely had notes attached to explain the relevance of the information, where it wasn't obvious. This seems like a valuable addition. |
|
|
If designed even moderately well the system will not allow the BCC: version of the message, the BCC: commented version, to go to anyone other than the BCC: recipients. The real disaster is when a BCC: recipient responds via a Reply All so some thought as to how to prevent that is needed. |
|
|
Maybe a BCC: version of the message doesn't allow a Reply All or, alternatively, the original To: and CC: recipient data is moved out of the destination fields and to the message body upon sending so that a Reply All only picks up the addressees on the BCC: line but still allows those to see to whom the To: and CC: message was sent to. |
|
|
I just open an already sent message as "new" and change the recipients to whoever might be on a bcc list, and that way I've got plenty of space to write new notes... AND I've insured that I won't inadvertently say something that goes to the wrong person. I think BCC is a little dumb on email anyway. [-] |
|
|
//I think BCC is a little dumb on email anyway// you wouldn't if you had to scroll down two pages of contacts to get to the message. |
|
|
[po], I feel bad for you... really, I do... there are a lot of other ways to handle that problem though. Depends on the email software being used. |
|
|
zig, I would reply but I feel the interface may not show my answer for days now - its all very weird... |
|
| |