h a l f b a k e r yThe embarrassing drunkard uncle of invention.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Nice, but don't drag that wire over the landmines. [+] |
|
|
Magnetometers need to be very close to
the surface to detect mines. |
|
|
There could be entanglement issues if the wire gets
caught. Perhaps, have a squad of them, tethered
together by the power line/cable combination, but
holding the tether arrangement mostly off the
ground. |
|
|
Even better if it were possible to substitute "cat" for "mine" ... |
|
|
//Wy not? Wire's cheap, if it detonates the mines, all well and good.// |
|
|
Because unless it is heavily armoured, the wire will break and the blimp will float off across a minefield (depending upon wind direction), where retrieval might be a tad difficult. |
|
|
Modern mines contain very little metal, to frustrate easy detection and removal by metal detectors. |
|
|
This therefore is not going to work. |
|
|
Ok how about plan b a larger blimp, with a heavy 60kg
dead weight dangling down on a light weight rope.
Using the same power line drifting at an angle. The
Man sized weight is bumped up and down until
"Kablooie" weight is sent 15 m away, possibly
triggering further explosions. To deal with the
explosion pulling and tearing the blimp scenario may
require some elasticated attachments may be
necessary. |
|
|
Blimp is wheeled back to base station and new 60kg
weight is added. Systematic test resumes. |
|
|
It sounds like the blimp is likely to endure some career-ending injuries in the process, but I'm all for the idea. How about selling these things in pairs: one mine, one blimp. |
|
|
Magnetometers can be much more effective at locating things than metal detectors. However, magnetometers must be a good distance from electrical wires in order to detect anything. |
|
| |