h a l f b a k e r yThe mutter of invention.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Bed Roll
A cylindrical, rotary bed for compact living and safe sleeping | |
This tube-shaped bed has a diameter of one meter and turns on a horizontal axle. The bed linen and pillow are also cylindrical and on the outside. The soft mattress provides a flat, one-meter width upon which to sleep.
Upon rolling in any direction, the bed notes the weight shift and rotates in
the opposite direction, keeping the sleeper "in" the virtually endlessly wide bed. To get out of bed one must get off at a right angle or crawl off the foot of the bed.
[link]
|
|
I would hope they'd all be hanging upsidedown in their cylindrical covers. |
|
|
You probably wouldn't need a motor. If this has an axle then shifting your weight would be enough to re-orient the tube (a bit like a very long hamsterwheel). You could rock yourself gently from side to side. I'm not sure that the double version would be comfortable, though. |
|
|
I like sleeping all curled up, but don't rotate me or I'll barf. |
|
|
st3f: It may not be clear that one sleeps on top of the tube, not in it. Even with the axis close to the top, I can't picture the bed self-adjusting to a roll on the hay. |
|
|
// I'm not sure that the double version would be comfortable // |
|
|
Especially when the bed partners rolled in opposite directions, and the servo started to hunt ....... |
|
|
Better, two "conveyor" systems, side by side. |
|
|
is there room for the dog? |
|
|
I was assuming sleeping on the inside. The outside sounds more comfortable, if a little more precarious. |
|
|
8th of 7: Yes, twin beds only. |
|
|
po: Yes, but not for both of you. |
|
|
If you spun it fast enough more than one could use it. |
|
|
I'm not sure I understand how you can have a "flat one-meter width" to sleep on and also have a "diameter of one meter". I also don't understand how this promotes "compact living", as a normal single bed is about a meter wide anyway. |
|
|
I was imagining a spongy, soft mattress that flattened out to approximately a meter depending on the sleeping position. I believe the norm here (Scandinavia) anyway is more 1.3 m for single beds. |
|
|
I think I would feel too much like a "Tootsie Roll" sleeping in one of these. Maybe with a sheet twisted around my neck and feet for extra security? |
|
|
This gives me a much better excuse for sleeping late. "I just CAN'T get out of bed in the morning!" |
|
| |