h a l f b a k e r yExtruded? Are you sure?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
I have just emailed a custom virus to bakesperson which is currently hiding on the halfbakery server and doing a search and replace on the whole drive.
“Custard” will become “foul, yellow dog vomit”.
“Sphericon” will become “ball of EVIL”.
“Tumbleweed” will become “morsicant monster”.
Any
instances of the word “pirate” will be replaced by “feckless seafaring nancy-boy”.
Soon this idea will no longer make sense.
Foul yellow dog vomit
http://www.hiddencu...com/hiddencures.htm
What my de-tox overnight foot pads look like the next morning. [mensmaximus, Mar 25 2005]
A Fat Snook
http://marinefisher...ishID/snookfat.html
None the wiser. [wagster, Mar 26 2005]
proof, if proof were needed.
http://www.b3ta.com/board/4233086
[calum, Mar 28 2005]
[link]
|
| |
Wow, really? That's kind of cool. But what if it starts to mutate, and changes 'croissant' to 'banana peel' and 'bones' to 'spikey hotdog'? And then every word starts to become something else? I think of this with awe and fear. |
|
| |
*watches giant space croissant slowly break in two and fall to the planet surface* |
|
| |
//And then every word starts to become something else?// Think of all the new ideas that will come of this! |
|
| |
//Think of all the new ideas that will come of this!// |
|
| |
Which is why I think this is kind of cool. |
|
| |
Well, a pile of foul, yellow dog vomit for you, my old feckless seafaring nancy-boy. |
|
| |
The "Half-Heard Genius" virus |
|
| |
I already have the foul yellow dog vomit category covered today, after looking at my de-tox pads that I had on overnight on my feet. Does everyone's lymph system look as contaminated as mine? |
|
| |
See pictures on link near bottom of article. |
|
| |
I should probably point out that apart from the fact that I wouldn't know how to, I couldn't do anything that would deface the genius of Supermarket Pirates. I was just having a moment. Thought this might get boned. |
|
| |
To give a banana peel or a spikey hot dog? |
|
| |
"Oh fruddled gruntbuddly" |
|
| |
thy micturations are to me |
|
| |
As plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee |
|
| |
Groop I implore thee, my foonting turlingdromes |
|
| |
And hooptiously drangle me with crinkly |
|
| |
Or I will rend thee in the gobberwarts with my blurglecruncheon, |
|
| |
But now everyone is going to read my "Seafaring Foul
Yellow Ball of Morsicant Nancy-boy Dog Vomit" idea
completely out of context. |
|
| |
I'm sorry but I'm just not finding anything redeeming about this "idea." |
|
| |
Just turn on the "smoke" or "snook" parameters upon your machine. |
|
| |
Well I've found out what a Snook is, but it hasn't explained anything. |
|
| |
[+ or -] Hell, I don’t know what to do. If I give this a bun, Desert Fox will want to turn it into a movie. |
|
| |
Hahaha. It seems to be in effect! The words in the idea hav changed! |
|
| |
Of course, it would explain something if all the previous occurrences of “foul, yellow dog vomit” have been replaced by
“custard,” “feckless seafaring nancy-boy” by “pirate,” etc. |
|
| |
// "Oh fruddled gruntbuddly" // |
|
| |
wagster... your intent has merit, though the jist is little more than a rant. I applaud the aim toward originality. |
|
| |
This is akin to the now-discontinued b3ta swear filter, where the various swearwords were automatically replaced with "watermelon", "cranberry" and other assorted fruits. The net effect was that that the board's postings became mired in a sea of notionally hilarious fruit noise. I suspect that, despite the halfbakery's supposedly more mature contributorship, implementation of this similar idea would yield similar results. |
|
| |
Oh and what waugsqueke said. |
|
| |
I take back my former criticism. I guess I didn't understand it, or suffered a momentary lapse of intellect (common). So, what waugs says. |
|
| |
waugs is not always right. |
|
| |