h a l f b a k e r yWe have a low common denominator: 2
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
There are perhaps a thousand generic shapes that are very common on television. (for example, human shape, retangular prism, chair shape, or car shape)
One could design a machine that would, in advance of each scene, blow up balloons for and slightly modify(1) the dimensions of each shape to match
the thing to be modeled.
A seperate part of the machine would be the actual display area. The shapes would be moved about by magnitism, air currents, or little robotic arms from behind. At the same time lasers would shine on them from the front to give the appropriate appearances and textures. I think a uniform matte white in a very dark display area would do it.
(1) The balloons would be made of a ferrous metal, and have electromagnets inside to pull in the material at the appropriate places. Electricity can be supplied through said arms. Alternatively, use many little, various shaped balloons and they can be stuck togather in advance with static electricity to make appropriate complex shapes.
[link]
|
| |
Better than feral balloons.
sp. "separate", "together", "magnetism" , "matt" |
|
| |
No, "matte" is fine, as in Lat. "mattus", dull. (And I know dull!) |
|
| |
I'm unclear on what this is trying to do. At first I thought you wanted to make pixels in a 3-D display ("voxels") where inflated is "on" and deflated is "off", but then you added lasers, robots, and magnetism, and now I'm no longer sure what it does. |
|
| |
Unrelatedly, I want a balloon animal 3-D printer with gloved robot arms that twist and pull under computer control. |
|
| |
I think you can only buy them without the
gloves. Bummer. |
|
| |
If the starting point is 'shapes that are very common on television', that suggests that the goal is broadly two-dimensional with, perhaps, an element of bas-relief. Three dimensions would create challenges for the 'robotic arms from behind' (conceptual difficulties with the definition of 'behind' and practical difficulties with crowding). |
|
| |
So, [Voice], are we talking about a sort of animated bas-relief of balloons, or have I got this wrong? |
|
| |
balloons that are selected, inflated, and attached to each-other "behind the curtain", as is were, and then moved into a viewing section. Only 3D for a 90 degree viewing angle if you're moving them about with robotic arms. The lasers give the balloons color, the balloons are 3-D, hence a 3-D color display |
|
| |