h a l f b a k e r yThe mutter of invention.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I found a heavily bunned but dated
reality TV
show idea here in the halfbakery called
"1970s
House" that I linked to the site of the
recent
MTV series "The 70s House." When a
halfbakery post is found to be
significantly
baked, a link that leads to the proof
could be
highlighted
by a special symbol. I'm
thinking
an inverted lightbulb, but open to other
concepts. Tagging a link with a 'Baked
Bulb'
could only be done by [jutta] or
[moderator].
1970s House
1970s_20House halfbaked [Cube, Jan 27 2006]
The 70s House
http://www.mtv.com/..._house/series.jhtml baked [Cube, Jan 27 2006]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
Thinking in sweeping (hypothetical) generalities here, but in order for something to get the 'official' bulb of approval, what should the criteria be? |
|
|
Why a bulb? Maybe we could have a chefs hat?, or a microwave oven? Oven Gloves?? |
|
|
Actually, if ideas are really-really baked, they are usually mfd'd (Marked for deleti0n) and removed at some point.... |
|
|
This is good, but it should only be applied to older ideas that have been baked, not an idea that can be marked "widely known to exist". So, to sum up, ideas that were on the HB before they were baked, yes, ideas that are freshly posted despite their real life existence, no. |
|
|
Just posting a link on the idea with a caption of "now baked" or something along those lines would serve the same purpose and involve no moderator involvement. |
|
|
And I can't see there being enough ideas like the linked one to warrant the effort. Although there was that TV show linked on something a while ago where they made cream cheese rings and the anti-ouch lego system. Also, there's a spork somewhere around here. |
|
|
<Wanders off mumbling and considering creating the user account of [moderator]> |
|
| |