h a l f b a k e r yIt's the thought that counts.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
this is cool, i'll have to do some thinking about it, i've always liked optics, but i've never had the chance to really study it properly and fully |
|
|
it's not the camera idea that i like most, but the turning a colour image into a black and white one using just optics idea |
|
|
Digital cameras have this. I can speak for Sony Mavica as that is what I have. It comes with a B+W, Sepia, Solarize and Neg-Art as picture effects. Nifty. With 35mm, I believe looking through a green filter gives one a reasonable idea of the B+W end product. |
|
|
Definitely doable with a digital camera, you just need a B&W viewer on the back*, or a B&W mode selection for the viewer. |
|
|
I think it won't ever be a popular product (artistic stuff never is, otherwise it's not art), so you're talking hugely expensive. This might be a feature on an upscale digital SLR |
|
|
(*or, on the other hand, it might be a way for a cheap digital camera maker to cut costs.) |
|
|
You cannot convert full-spectrum light into true black and white using optics. Cameras like the upper-scale Fuji Finepix digitals offer digital through-the-lens Electronic Viewfinder, but no B&W mode. Many Sony models do offer B&W, but you'll have to watch the LCD display for the effect. |
|
|
Some Cannons and Nikons have a B+W mode, also sepia and other things. |
|
|
When you convert a color image to grayscale, you have lots
of control over how that happensyou can blend the color
channels in different ways. When the camera does it, it
either picks one wavelength (if I make the right assumption
about the optical solution) or just takes the average of red,
green, and blue for each pixel (if it's digital). Therefore, the
viewfinder preview might look quite different from the final
grayscale image. |
|
| |