h a l f b a k e r yNot just a think tank. An entire army of think.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I hope this never happens because it would drive me nuts, but it's such a tremendous concept that I *have* to pastrify it. <aside>I have often suspected that sightings of ghosts could be 'explained' by the notion of emotionally charged events being somehow 'recorded' into the fabric of their surroundings, and replayed.</aside> |
|
|
A charming idea. But let's face it. Most persons are far more desirous of making a statement than able to make that statement creatively. Inevitably, the wall would end up a chorus of "Fuck you!"s, "<Name> rules!" and "<Ethnic, national, or affinity group> sucks!" If it's visual pollution when I see it, isn't it aural pollution when I hear it? At least the form of certain graffiti shows some creatively. |
|
|
[angel] I read a sci-fi story once with that exact premise (ghosts, emotionally charged events, and walls). In the story, one of the characters builds a machine that simulates the circumstances that are required for "playback" (a sort of ghost machine).
I remember that the title of the story was "These Stones Will Remember", and a quick search tells me that it was written by Reginald Bretnor and published in the Feb 1981 issue of Issac Asimov's Science Fiction magazine. (God I love the Internet!)
|
|
|
Thanks for that, [mwburden], I shall look for the book. It's a bit annoying that the idea came to me at least ten years prior to the book though. |
|
|
Actually, the idea has been around for a long time.
The central concept of the story wasn't that, but rather was a machine that generated the conditions required for "playback" more effeciently than nature ever did left to it's own devices. The machine could be taken to a place where something historically significant happened and cause the ghosts to re-enact the event for you. |
|
|
"why not put small microphones and speakers ..." |
|
|
Because it would be even more annoying than graffiti already is, by making it audibly noisy as well as visibly noisy. Enjoy the fishbone. |
|
|
I would have sooooooo much fun with this! I would frighten the passers-by out of their wits by recording wailing, screams, the cries of small children, someone being murdered, etc. Some of my friends and I like to act, so I'd have no trouble enlisting help. Of course, everyone who passed would hate our guts... |
|
|
have you seen a programme for children ect called 'it'll never work' with a bit on something similar |
|
|
I think the "Tories out" speaker should be bigger than the rest. |
|
|
Most of the soundbytes would be crude, I'm afraid. I reject that ugly sound. |
|
|
smell graffiti. ooh I'm clever. |
|
|
electromagnetic graffiti: hide some superconductors; annoy the local pigeons. |
|
| |