h a l f b a k e r yThe mutter of invention.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
Thank you for sharing this. |
|
| |
this is from OpenAI same tech as the poets I linked recently |
|
| |
Dalle 2 is impressive for AI, but the way they crippled it (with the intent to prevent making deep fakes) ruined it. Anything that might somehow start to resemble a human face is replaced with a big ugly smear. So my "There is a lake in a forest. There is one canoe in it. An old man wearing an ushanka is fishing and smoking a cigar" turned out beautifully 6 out of 10 shots, except his head was an ugly blob every time. |
|
| |
Wow, [a1], that story is glorious. Thanks for posting it. It takes real talent to write like that. |
|
| |
I would if evil copyright laws didn't have 70 year old stories locked down. edit: Wow, I see there are many up on good ol' Gutenburg. |
|
| |
So I'm wondering what would happen if you would ask it to do some art in its own style? |
|
| |
Get on the waiting list and find out. |
|
| |
Other semi-interesting takes would be to have it paint some abstract nouns lile curiosity or foolishness and see what it does with it. |
|
| |
//a bunch of blobby rounded rectangles// That's what happens when you're talking to an AI which doesn't know the difference between abstract art and an abstract noun. |
|
| |
This is what I got when I asked it to "paint curiosity"
[Link] |
|
| |
Oversized eyes, nose, and mouth to emphasize desire to accept input, creative colors. Maybe it does understand. Only the sardonic expression isn't curious. |
|
| |
Hey Ray, "Paint curiosity" link's broken. Got another one? |
|
| |
I can't use that site, or rather I am unwilling to permit 40 advertising and tracking scripts. Is there a better one? |
|
| |
//painted himself into a corner// |
|
| |
If I admit to liking the Mondrian joke, will people think I'm square? |
|
| |
Hey, those luggages are pretty good |
|
| |
I tried entering other HB ideas into craiyon, but it just isn't up to the task. |
|
| |
Do we know for sure this is a computer and not a couple of kids with photoshop SAYING it's AI? |
|
| |
Because if they were to charge for this, that would be a pretty clever scam. |
|
| |
Things get fuzzy around Mechanical Turk levels of automation. What percentage of human input makes it non-AI? If I, a human (I deny vigorously any claims to the contrary) say "draw a lake" and a computer draws one that involves some human input, does it not? So from the beginning it's a relative amount of input. Until a computer is deciding on its own to ask another computer to draw something it's partially human made. And who told the AI what a lake is? Are they completely trained from scratch without expert guidance? If so it's still human documents they got the definition of "lake" from. Okay, I'm rambling and will now stop. |
|
| |
[a1] would you happen to have an image host with fewer tracking scripts and adblock blockers? |
|
| |
The prompt provided is human input, and so too is the human looking at the output and saying if they like it or not. So, to be totally autonomous the machine has to decide off its own initiative to do the artwork, and then create it, and not show it to any humans. |
|
| |
//The prompt provided is human input, and so too is the human looking at the output and saying if they like it or not. So, to be totally autonomous the machine has to decide off its own initiative to do the artwork, and then create it, and not show it to any humans.// |
|
| |
Good point. Do they only show the good ones like the astronaut on the horse and hide ones that don't work? Are we seeing 100% of the outcome from these? Be curious to find out. |
|
| |
Thanks for asking. Imgur works with only a couple of scripts permitted (although it's still sketchy because the site is so big it can afford to perform tracking with only native scripts) imagebam.com works with only one. put.re too, perhaps. |
|
| |
[Voice's anti modern art rant] |
|
| |
People paying ridiculous amounts for art, & Musk paying a ridiculous amount for Twitter, can be summed up in one word: Smeagol.
"It's my birthday & I wants it!"
And if two obscenely rich people wants it, the price rises until one of then is bored. That then becomes "the price" of the object, & next time, it all starts again from there. |
|
| |