h a l f b a k e r yGo ahead. Stick a fork in it.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Excessive alcohol consumption is cause for many health problems and is a heavy burden on our healthcare system. Recent studies are showing, however, that light alcohol consumption (1 beer or one glass of wine per day) may actually be beneficial to ones health.
The problem with the current liquor tax
is that it taxes the purchaser of a 6-pack of beer the same as a 24-pack (per unit volume). Couple that with the volume discount of the 24-pack and you have a system which encourages "stocking up". From my experience, stocking up on booze generally increases consumption.
What I propose is an alcohol tax that varies proportionally with the total volume of alcohol purchased. So, for example, if we make the base alcohol tax 2%, and the alcoholic content of the beer is 5% and the can of beer is 355mL:
tax rate on 1 beer is: (0.02)X(0.05)X(355) = 35.5%
tax rate on 6 beer is: (0.02)X(0.05)X(355)X6 = 213%
etc ...
This formula will tax different alcoholic products fairly based on their alcoholic percentage. So a 1 litre bottle of 12% wine would be taxed at a rate of:
(0.02)X(0.12)X(1000) = 240%
The base alcohol tax is arbitrary. It's the formula that I'm pitchin' here ...
Highland Park
http://www.highlandpark.co.uk/
Acceptable. [8th of 7, Nov 14 2010]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
So I get a huge discount when I buy my 24 beers seperately? |
|
| |
Just no. It's not the government's business to be my
mother. [-] |
|
| |
Stocking up on booze doe not increase my consumption, just lessens the amount of times I have to go to the liquor store. |
|
| |
//It's not the government's business to be my
mother// |
|
| |
That's the Queen's business, right? Or does your
mother tax your alcohol? |
|
| |
(note to UK residents: Jokes about your Queen or
your mothers are not to be taken seriously.) |
|
| |
liter of vodka: the moral equivalent of speeding |
|
| |
I'd support a tax on politicians who propose new
taxes. |
|
| |
// 40 bucks for a halfway decent bottle // |
|
| |
Well, if you will swill down the cheap stuff ... |
|
| |
//Well, if you will swill down the cheap stuff ... <link>// |
|
| |
8th, you idiot! You DRINK that? I just checked with Huntley
and Palmer (the chauffers), and they tell me it's a screen-
wash. |
|
| |
//a heavy burden on our healthcare system//
You have a healthcare system!? |
|
| |
Tax rate = sugar content x alcohol content x [some
constant]? |
|
| |
This would leave children free to enjoy sweets, and
grownups free to enjoy grownup drinks. But it would heavily
penalize alcopops, Southern Comfort, vodka jellies, Baileys
and other alcoholic drinks aimed at children. |
|
| |