h a l f b a k e r yWe got your practicality ... right here.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Let me give an example.
Take the words:
drop, puddle, pond, lake, river, sea, ocean.
These objects are all water and only differ in quantity not in quality. Then why to remember so many words ? These seven words can be replaced a new words with a common root word ( such as 'wassa' taken from
german) and adding an indicator of quantity.
To indicate gradient of quantity/scale, vowel suffices can be used.
Lowest to highest gradient : a, e, i, o, u, ou, etc...
or simply digits can be used. 1, 2, 3 ,4 etc.
They become
drop = wassa;
puddle = wasse;
pond = wassi;
lake = wasso;
river = wassu;
Now it is lot easier to remember.
Or we could make it Wassa1, wassa2, wassa3 ..etc. But I prefer earlier one.
Another example of words would be :
crawl, walk, run etc.
or
infant, baby, teenager, man/woman, elder etc.
In a nutshell, when forming a new language, rather than inhereting words from other language as they are, artificially create words that are easier to pronounce, and easy to remember.
Compare remembering drop, puddle, pond, lake, river, sea, ocean against remembering wassa, wasse, wassi, wasso, wassu! .. It is extremly easy.
Similary rain, bristle, steam, flood, are related to water. They also can be dervied from root word "wassa", not by using same quantity gradient but along some other dimention such as density gradient/dimention.
Thus ice, snow, steam, rain, bristle may be formed along density dimention of root word "wassa".
I think Espranto critically lacks this feature.
With this technique we can create vocabulary of common words that can be memorized within 1 hour. Very useful for true globalization!
International language by stealth
http://web.archive....0stealth#1081045277 Back when i shared an account (sorry). [nineteenthly, Jan 21 2012]
Ars Signorum
http://books.google...iO4HAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA1 George Dalgarno, 1661 [pocmloc, Jan 23 2012]
The Collier Classification System for Very Small Objects
http://www.verysmallobjects.com/ in a similar vein... [prufrax, Jan 26 2012]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
|
I'll grant pond and lake differ only in size. Likewise creek(crick), stream, brook, river, etc. But a drop (falling water), puddle (accumulated water with no in and out flow), lake (accumulated water with in and out flow, surrounded by land and fresh), river (flowing water) are all different. |
|
|
Even sea (large body of salt water, with inflow, largely surrounded by land) and ocean (large body of salt water with inflow and no outflow, only partially surrounded by land) have slightly different meanings not related to size, although that one I'll allow is somewhat arbitrary. |
|
|
nice if everything were linear. but it ain't. |
|
|
//crawl, walk, run etc.// jog, canter, sidle, skip, hop, moonwalk, sprint, gallop, pace, bound, perambulate, dance, prance, stroll... |
|
|
Agreed. Objects listed are not exactly same in quality. However I think benefits outweigh costs in terms of remembering all the words for a new learner. For a novice just remembering a root word is sufficient to intutively guess what a new word might mean. |
|
|
[+]
//digits can be used// numbers could be the vowel sounds by themselves... it'd reinforce the other usage as well. |
|
|
//numbers could be the vowel sounds by themselves..//
Thats a good idea.! |
|
|
With concepts like these, it should be possible to design a language that any one can learn in 1 hour. |
|
|
Willl this language include Textperanto? |
|
|
//Willl this language include Textperanto?// |
|
|
I think it will branch out eventually. |
|
|
The thing is, what proportion of your vocabulary
could you simplify by using this method? |
|
|
More specifically, are there any words in this
annotation which would be addressed by such a
system? |
|
|
This is nowhere near good enough in the same way the first airplane was nowhere near good enough. This could take flight! |
|
|
Particularly I expect highly advanced civilisations that travel through space and make contact with other species would have something like this. So if we follow mathematical rules, this new language would be similar to theirs and we could make communication much easier in a future/science fiction type scenario. |
|
|
//The thing is, what proportion of your vocabulary could you simplify by using this method?
More specifically, are there any words in this annotation which would be addressed by such a system?// |
|
|
"The thing is" - part of the "importance" series
"proportion" - standalone
"vocabulary" - standalone (though arguably a related element of "letter, word, phrase, sentence, etc"
"simplify" - compression/decompression
"method" - standalone, though arguably part of "hint, like, method, facsimile, reality"
"more specifically" - sortof speaks for itself dunnit.
"words" - obvious part of "letter, word, phrase..." and the context in this case is actually the series itself, not just "words".
"annotation" - "placement of a note in a text document"
"addressed" - sliding scale of "directness" perhaps
"system" - see "method". |
|
|
The above is obviously an oversimplification, and illustrates the need for further linear notation concerning, at the very least, "ownership" of some kind. |
|
|
All your wordage are belong to us. |
|
|
Esperanto has -et- and -eg-, and zero for the degree between the two, and is very badly designed, but in this case i think a neutral degree could go unmarked and the two degrees above and below it could be marked, maybe by prefixes like the SI ones. Hence you could have lago - lake, lagego - inland sea, megalagego - ocean, lageto - pond, mikrolageto - puddle. |
|
|
However, "drop" and "river" belong in a different list, for instance: droplet, drop, splash (noun), bucketful - probably not very good examples. For "river", the sequence is something like trickle, burn, stream, tributary, river, estuary. I feel that a burn is not a stream but i'm not sure which way round they are and tributary may not belong there. |
|
|
I just realized, : It is partially baked in metric system. |
|
|
Root word : gram, meter etc. |
|
|
Quantity gradient : mili, centi, deca ...mega, tera etc. |
|
|
So we have megameter, Kilometer, centimemter, micrometer etc. |
|
|
However these gradients are a bit cryptic/machineistic to be used as a part of language. |
|
|
[nineteenthly,], I think we can not be purist in this scheme. If new learners can intuitively guess the meaning of a word with sufficient accuracy, that should be sufficient. |
|
|
A funny example would be forming names of colors, although it is not in exactly in realm of this scheame. |
|
|
Color names can be formed as a composition of R,G, B value (Red, Green, Blue). For example, |
|
|
Lets say, a = 0 i.e. min, e = 1, i = 2, o = 3 u = 4 (max.) |
|
|
black would be ( r = 0, g = 0, b = 0) |
|
|
White would be r = max, g = max, b = max; |
|
|
i.e. "RuGuBu". or Rugubu. |
|
|
Red would be R = max, G = 0, B = 0 |
|
|
A grey would be R = medium, B = medium, G = medium. |
|
|
Although, I must admit it sounds funny, but people may get used to it over time. |
|
|
Yes, it is sort of baked in the metric system, which leads me to my truly ancient idea to which i will attempt to link. The reason i suggested putting nothing in the middle is that it reduces the need to learn something and shortens the length of words. |
|
|
On colours: There's a classic work on implicational universals in colour terms called 'Basic Color Terms' i think, and along with Wittgenstein's 'Remarks On Colour' indicates that an RGB colour space, or any other, is not enough, though it would be OK for many purposes. A black square can look white depending on its surroundings, for example, and brown is not a real colour. There would also be a problem between pale luminosity, ash-colour and silver. |
|
|
//If new learners can intuitively guess the meaning of a word with sufficient accuracy, that should be sufficient.// |
|
|
But then language teachers would make less money... |
|
|
//The reason i suggested putting nothing in the middle is that it reduces the need to learn something and shortens the length of words// |
|
|
I too was thinking along same lines. |
|
|
// A black square can look white depending on its surroundings, for example, // |
|
|
//and brown is not a real colour// |
|
|
You mean it is not a primary color, but a combination of primary colors ? .. That does not stop us from replacing the name "brown" by its new suggested scheme, if we wish to do so. |
|
|
// Can you give examples ? //
Yes. In dim light, a white square might be just as dark as a black square in bright light - measuring the light reflected by a photometer could show it was emitting a similar number of photons at the same wavelengths, but one would be black and the other white. Something similar could happen on a TV or monitor, for instance, a CRT turned off might look greenish-brown but an unilluminated part of the screen when it's on would be interpreted as black. |
|
|
Brown, grey and other colours are mixtures, but also other things are going on with them. For instance, grey is only luminous if an unsaturated light is passing through it, and even then it's more like white. Brown is similarly a colour which can't be luminous unless one interprets what one is looking at as reflective. These are Wittgenstein's examples, and he gives others, some of which i disagree with. |
|
|
Would a brown book be less luminous than a blue
book? |
|
|
// are there any words in this annotation which would be addressed by such a system?// |
|
|
IMO, right approach would be make groups of all the synonyms. Then start with root word and add suffices. |
|
|
e.g. village, town, district, city, metropolis |
|
|
Above could be one of such groups. |
|
|
This idea surely isn't going to make song lyrics and poetry any more interesting. |
|
|
//This idea surely isn't going to make song lyrics and poetry any more interesting// |
|
|
Yes, Thats one possibility that needs to be worked out. There will be more repetativeness in words. But chances that repeatative words will come into same sentences will vary from sentance to sentance. |
|
|
On the other hand it might make poetry more interesting because it may be easier to make words rhyme. |
|
|
Totally baked and published already, exactly as described in this idea, in 1661. <link> |
|
|
[Zeno] Yes. I too think so. Such scheams will have to be formulated for communicating with aliens since such scheams take advantage of mathematics and logic. More complex scheams can be formualted such as the colors naming scheams give above. |
|
|
//exactly as described in this idea, in 1661. //
It does not look like english. |
|
|
Assuming that most common objects can be
sufficiently represented as an 8x8 icon, all that's
needed is a repertoire of 256 phonemes which can
be strung together into 8-phoneme words. |
|
|
I'm sure you're i ching to explain how little blocks of binary could possibly convey information. |
|
| |