h a l f b a k e r yThis is what happens when one confuses "random" with "profound."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
| |
I think you're getting the basic point bigsleep.... |
|
| |
Giving you a rough time Bigsleep, it got submitted
accidentally without the description. I'll invite you
over to my house to drink a pint and watch tv, I'll
even let you pick the channel... |
|
| |
picture in picture does this...(without glasses) |
|
| |
//Bars could show two difference football games at the same time (when glassessless technology comes out)//
No.
The 'glasses-less' is for 3D, showing 2 images at the same time to everybody, and typically for a small set of fixed viewpoints.
For '1 screen/2 views', you must have glasses of some sort; typically active LCD glasses, so the TV can send the timing signal. It could be done with polarised glasses, but you would need 3 different pairs, depending on whether you were watching 3D, imagestream 1, or imagestream 2. |
|
| |
Can't we just buy another TV? |
|
| |
So, a 3D TV can be used to provide 3 dimensions to
one viewer (3 x 1 = 3), or two dimensions to 2
viewers (2 x 2=4). Something's wrong here. |
|
| |
One dimension to each of three viewers? |
|
| |
That was my point. You get more value for fewer
dimensions - 1 x 3D =3, but 2 x 2D=4. So, how many
1D viewers could you accommodate? |
|
| |
Actually, allowing for Time, I guess it's 1 x 4D = 4; 2 x
3D=6. |
|
| |
There is also another way to accomplish this [link]. |
|
| |
If both of them displayed the same cup of coffee... |
|
| |
Oh, sorry, well six hundred and twenty five, of course! |
|
| |
//The 'glasses-less' is for 3D, showing 2 images at
the same time to everybody, and typically for a
small set of fixed viewpoints.
No. |
|
| |
The glassessless tv's provide two different images
to the eye at once. small screens like the 3ds use
prismatic lenses, big ones still aren't feasibl.e |
|
| |
But nothing dictates that the images have to
converge a few inches are part for stereoscopic
viewing. you could just as easily have the images
converge several feet apart so one side of the
couch or bar could watch one image, the other
side another image. |
|
| |
1D viewers are already catered for. A standard definition PAL TV signal resolves on the screen as 576 lines, so you could have the same number of 1D viewers. They might have a little trouble keeping track of which line was theirs, but you could help sort that out with sunglasses spray-painted black and a thin line scratched across them. |
|
| |
So, nothing to do with multiple cross-dressers? |
|
| |
[marked-for-deletion] redundant, sorry! |
|
| |