h a l f b a k e r yOh yeah? Well, eureka too.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Replace current Siri-type assistants with succinct AI discussions, followed by actions.
carbs raw tahini
[05:18] 3.8g per tbsp
put 2 in my sugr grp
[5:20] wrote WhatsApp Sugar group: carbs 7.6g (2 tbsp Raw Tahini)
Thanks
[5:21] No prob.
[6:00] Hey Pashute? Reminder!
Call Zehava. Want details?
Yes
[6:00] Set time for recording Two to Do.
OK call her.
[link]
|
| |
The verbose style of communication is intended to make intent or context more clear to the listener or reader. I understand that this is the reason why legal texts are often very verbose, since they have to be unambiguously clear. |
|
| |
Therefore there is a hard limit below which concision starts to remove necessary data. I think that the style you propose is likely below that limit, with concomitant potential for hilarious misunderstandings. |
|
| |
And once you pass below the Concision Limit, why stop there? Why not just have |
|
| |