Do we put conspiracy theory ideas in the associated category, or should we have a category just for conspiracies? And why am I asking this? Who put that idea in my head?
-- smendler, Jan 18 2011

[giggling behind the sofa]

Sssh! I don't think he's seen us yet!
-- DrBob, Jan 18 2011


well, it's only a theory...
-- xandram, Jan 18 2011


We don't have this category, because a conspiracy theory isn't really considered a halfbaked invention. It's probably quite easy to generate any number of non-plausable, ego-centric theories implicating various external parties as running things behind the scenes for their own ends. Some of those might be entertaining, but I wont hold my breath.
-- zen_tom, Jan 18 2011


There's no need for the category .... move along, nothing to see here folks ..... just move along .... what branch of the Police ? Yes, the Thought Police, yes, M'am. Nothing to see here ... keep moving ...
-- 8th of 7, Jan 18 2011


There's no substantive evidence of any sort of a conspiracy, or the presence of a mole - which is, of course, just what you'd expect. Highly suspicious ....
-- 8th of 7, Jan 18 2011


//a conspiracy theory isn't really considered a halfbaked invention// Several ideas here have 'conspiracy theory' as their central theme, without simply being an example of a conspiracy theory. You could equally well argue that "a car isn't really considered a halfbaked invention".
-- spidermother, Jan 29 2011


Today's halfbaked conspiracy theory is tomorrows working supposition.

Theoretically a halfbaked conspiracy is the same as a full blown one.

Every conspiracy is halfbaked, at least in theory.

Conspiring to halfbake a theory should be categorically denied.
-- pashute, Jul 08 2020


Why was this idea supressed and hidden for over nine years?
-- pocmloc, Jul 08 2020


False flag!
-- RayfordSteele, Jul 08 2020



random, halfbakery