h a l f b a k e r yIt's the thought that counts.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
For each sock design, stich a somewhat unique number on the sole. Similar but different socks are often difficult to discern when matching, a problem that would be solved using a numbered code.
The numbers wouldn't really have to be globally unique - 4 or 5 digits would make it unlikely that you'd
own 2 pairs of different socks with the same number.
a solution
http://semacode.org
you could stitch a semacode pattern in the bottom. lovely. [neilp, May 15 2006]
[link]
|
| |
Or just buy two dozen identical socks. Any two make a pair. |
|
| |
Certainly a solution. But must it be the only one? |
|
| |
More than one solution to a problem? That is like saying there can be more than one American Idol! More than one Apprentice! That is unAmerican! You must pick the one solution that everyone else does. |
|
| |
But, no, you are right, there are other ways to sort socks. sigh. |
|
| |
Thanks [Worldgineer] for not declaring RFID as the answer. It's nice to see simple solutions for simple problems. |
|
| |
there are always *5 digits* in each of my socks.... |
|
| |
I have a brother who lost a toe in a motorcycle accident. Would he have a nine digit code? |
|
| |
For the innumerate, use animals instead of numbers. Penguin goes with penguin. OOps, it's been baked--Garanimals clothes. |
|
| |
Or, give each package of socks (for us who buy socks in bulk) a specific number, that way you could tell both which socks match, and how old they are. |
|
| |
I simply number my sock pairs with a black Vivid marker when I buy them (at least, the ones that are the same) so I don't get them mixed up in the wash.
It means the pair wears at the same rate too, otherwise you run the risk of (accidentally) using one sock of a type more than all the others, so it wears out much faster.
Saves the sock manufacturer from adding the complexity of a changing number to their Sock-o-matic (or whatever they use to make socks). |
|
| |
The technical name is a Sock-a-tron. But that is only for the decoy socks. The real ones come from a galaxy far, far away and enter our Earth through conveniently-placed portals. Good luck to you trying to number those; they are evil and more than able to hold their own. |
|
| |
Yes I intended the manfacturer to add this, not the consumer. I'd perfer to keep it simple to reduce visual burden. Plus I would rather not to have a left or right sock - that would certainly increase effort for matching and dressing. |
|
| |
+ The long tragic affair of sock E45-23A |
|
| |
seriously, [world], check out semacodes (link), they're what you want. |
|
| |
Thanks, but I want something as human-readable as possible. I don't want to scan my socks with my cell phone while sorting. Unless you're implying the creation of an automatic sock sorting machine... |
|
| |