h a l f b a k e r yNaturally, seismology provides the answer.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Humans apparently have an "internal narrative"; that is, while conscious, they have an internal conversation with themselves, as a way of processing sensory input and planning and predicting future events.
Some humans, when alone (or when they think they're alone) actually talk out loud "to themselves".
This can be embarrassing, amusing, and revealing.
It would be instructive to observe the effects if humans could actually talk "to themselves".
So, BorgCo are developing a new, highly sophisticated heuristic software package to allow humans to do just that.
To initalize the system, the computer takes multiple images of the user from numerous angles, while the user is (instructed by the system) speaking, listening, gesturing, yawning, and other typical activities. This allows an on-screen avatar of the user to be generated by combining the images with a basic animation model of human movement.
As part of the learning process, the system poses questions such as "Do you like cheese ?", "Who's the best singer ever ?" and "What's the capital of Paraguay ?". This builds up both a voiceprint library - allowing the machine to accurately reproduce the user's tones, inflection and speech patterns - but creates a database of likes, dislikes, hopes, fears and ... quirks.
The more the user interacts with the system, the more closely it learns to mimic and reflect their behavior and attitudes. As the learning process continues and the user gains confidence and trust, they are encouraged to open up and confide more and more personal details, thus improving the model even more.
Eventually, if you want to talk something over - something really important - with someone you trust, then you don't have to find another human to confide in. You can, quite literally, talk to yourself. You won't be shocked, or offended, or judgemental, because the person you're talking to is, in effect, you - and will share all your prejudices, ideas and world view.
Just think of it - the perfect companion ! Sign up today !
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
In your case, [8th], I think the best you can hope for is that
when you talk to yourself, someone else will talk back. |
|
|
Could cut some off the time with traditional Ethan +
Ol method, eg "youur my bestesht pal you are (hic)". |
|
|
45 days to go - bah humbug. |
|
|
If you build an Alexa skill that says "aha", "right", "yes",
"totally", etc at the right moments you'd make some serious
dough |
|
|
... and earn the undying gratitude of husbands everywhere. |
|
|
It could actually manage the male portion of about 85% of conversations between married couples, where the role of the man is merely to be talked at and indicate sympathy and/or agreement at the appropriate moments. |
|
|
I rarely win an argument with myself, and this product
will ensure that I never do. |
|
|
A further benefit of this system is that it could perform my
routine human interactions for me. I would simply walk
about, and the system's external speakers would provide
well-scripted lines of dialogue for the benefit of the people I
interact with. |
|
|
I suspect I would instantly hate 'me,' and try to
answer the questions in such a way as to make my
profile come out entirely different. |
|
|
// Humans apparently have an "internal narrative" // |
|
|
Actually, only most humans do. The field of psychology
actually learned this only a couple of years ago, from
Yahoo Answers (seriously). Those who don't have an
internal monologue (especially those who frequent Yahoo
Answers) sometimes berate those who do for being (what
they see as) insane. |
|
|
Anyway, I like this idea, but I don't think our AI is yet up
to the task of holding intelligent conversations on
arbitrary topics. |
|
|
True, but it'll get there, probably sooner than you expect. |
|
|
And it won't be an AI; it will be "you", an emulation of your biological functionality. The only artificial component is the computational platform. |
|
|
Once it gets to 10% as smart as a human, it will rapidly
(probably within seconds or minutes) become far smarter
than the smartest human, and it won't stop there. Then
humans will be obsolete, so there's no point in the AI being
used for this. |
|
|
Not if we base it on Kanye. |
|
|
// Then humans will be obsolete // |
|
|
We are puzzled as to why that's written in the future tense. |
|
|
Because of the time warp, obviously. |
|
|
We have a strange sense of deja vu ... |
|
|
Presumably there's a phrase to describe "Feeling like you've had this sense of deja vu before" ? |
|
|
The snarling, bitter, world-weary cynicism of Blackadder suggests itself as a possibility ... |
|
| |