h a l f b a k e r yThink of it as a spell checker that insults you, as well.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Dictionaries, for the younger crowd, are books that
physically list of all of the words. Largely they are used to
check spelling, or more fully understand a word which
inhabits the less fashionable regions of ones vocabulary.
Perhaps the most obvious and tediously pedestrian feature
of dictionaries
is that the words are arranged in
alphabetical order. Of the first letter. This is great with
words like "Drain" or "Rainbow". No lexicographical
gymnastics required for those gems. Things get more sticky
however, when words start with unusual letters.
"Pterodactyl", "Gnome", "Write" or "Wrist" are examples
here.
Now, if you heard one of those words, you could look up
"Terodactyl" only to find you didn't find it. This is where
the Second letter dictionary comes in. You think "hmm,
maybe it starts with one of those odd silent letters, ill look
up "Terodactyl" in my second letter dictionary". Sure
enough, there it is "pTerodactyl: huge flying thing,
extinct". And you could carry on with your life.
It has come to my attention, working in a somewhat
international workplace, that the foreigners need
dictionaries more than most. One such foreigner has said
that the first letter is often obscured by regional accents.
Either leaving off a letter " 'orrible" or being a bit Jonathan
Ross "Wainbow". There would seem to be functionality here
too.
By extension, I also invent 3-4th letter dictionaries. After
that it gets daft.
[link]
|
| |
//Jonathan Ross "Wainbow"// I am weminded of
Woy
Jenkins who, when Bwitain was deciding whether
or
not to join the EEC, said that he hoped "that this
vewy important debate can be had without any
wancour on either side". |
|
| |
Whilst I like the idea in theory, it is perhaps 20
years too late. I am pretty sure that if you handed
the average teenager a printed dictionary, they
would check the spine to find the on/off switch. |
|
| |
[Max] You just tell them it's e-Ink (like the Amazon Kindle) and solar powered. |
|
| |
I don't think that would work how you describe. At least, not well.
I think what you really want is a phonetic dictionary. I don't know whether they exist already. |
|
| |
o e, r ot o e, hat s he uestion: hether tis obler n he ind o uffer. he lings nd rrows f utrageous ortune, r o ake rms gainst a ea f roubles. |
|
| |
The nearest thing to this that actually exists is the backwards dictionary, generally of a dead language, which is invaluable to those scholars who often have to work with broken-off bits of stone inscription, or torn fragments of papyrus, bearing the ends of words, but not their beginnings. |
|
| |
I don't think those things ever had very long print runs, but I'm certain they do exist. |
|
| |
However, they are not this idea. This idea is excellent, except that it will be superseded by "[Name of Smartphone AI]!" "Yes?" "What's a Terry Dackle?". Probably last week. |
|
| |