h a l f b a k e r yIt's not a thing. It will be a thing.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Ever wished you'd recorded that nasty conversation with your boss, colleague, business associate, etc., in order to be later used as evidence?
In at least some countries (e.g. Australia), there are legal problems with recording conversations without permission of the other party. Certain situations
seem to stretch the definition of "permission" - e.g. Taxis simply have a sign warning that conversation may be recorded.
I propose T-Shirts printed/emblazoned across the front with words along the lines of "Warning: Conversation May Be Recorded".
The idea being that any individual engaging you in conversation has been warned about the potential to be recorded. Of course, no-one will be quite sure whether the T-Shirts are serious or some witty post-modern joke... so they won't hold back on their incriminating behaviour...
Oh, and assuming success of the legal angle, the T-Shirts could be pre-prepared with wires and listening/recording devices for the conveinience of the purchasor...
[link]
|
| |
I like it. [+][+] if you can incorporate a waterproof flash-based voice recorder, and if you throw in Bluetooth, my head asplode. |
|
| |
Here (Australia), an acceptable notice that your telephone conversation is being recorded is an audible beep every few seconds. You could make the shirt do this, perhaps. |
|
| |
so that's what that beeping noise is.. I had no idea. |
|
| |
apart from the wired-up bit where you might get mistaken for a terrorist... |
|
| |
In the case of a work environment you could make it as a tie. |
|
| |
I'm no expert but this what I think. |
|
| |
In the US, many states prohibit audio recording unless both (or all) parties actually consent to the recording. In these states, the shirt warning is likely insufficient or certainly challengeable. |
|
| |
In other states, those that allow single-party consent, only the party doing the recording and being recorded themselves need to consent and, so, the warning is superfluous. |
|
| |
This could quickly become an ironic T-shirt, much like FBI ones. If so it could be used by undercover cops with a sense of humour. It would seem so blatant that nobody would suspect them. |
|
| |
Interaction surveillance is not limited to audio any more. Would some of there t-shirts read "Warning. I may be videotaping you right now"? Because that would be creepy. |
|
| |
Video recording without audio isn't covered by many of the current consent laws. It's the audio that matters and is of greater evidentiary value, especially if a re-telling. |
|
| |
HAL-9000 gets along just fine with only video, thanks. |
|
| |
Isn't that a fictional device? |
|
| |
Item 5: T-Shirts are deemed inappropriate for employee dress. |
|
| |
Item 6: Clothing implanted recording devices are considered inappropriate for our buisiness. Any such use of said devices are grounds for immediate dismissal, and any use of such device is inadmissable in a court of law. |
|
| |
You will, of course, have to sign something similar to the above mentioned before accepting the job, you know. |
|
| |
(plus, you already signed something to the effect that any legal action you want to take against the company will be settled by an "cough, cough, (sorry) Independant ARBITRATOR") |
|
| |