h a l f b a k e r yOn the one hand, true. On the other hand, bollocks.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Almost every hobby has been televised as a competitive
game
show over the last few years. There's Bakeoff (baking),
Glowup (make-up), The Big Fish Off (fishing), Castoff
(knitting), Buzz Off (chain-saw sculpture) and Legoff (Lego
construction). No doubt Channel 4 will launch Fuckoff
sooner
or later.
Ark-building, though, has not yet had its moment in the
spotlight and is, in fact, a rather neglected hobby of late. It
could do with an injection of televisualization. It's also
notable that animal programmes are always popular, whilst
nature conservancy groups are invariably short of funds.
MaxVision (the entertainment battalion of MaxCo.) has
therefore hit upon the perfect win-win programme - Arkoff.
It
will bring ark-building out of the shadows and perhaps renew
interest in the hobby, whilst also drawing attention to the
plight of endangered species in the face of rising seal evels.
Each episode will feature two teams of ark-builders, with
each
team consisting of one person, a saw, a chisel and a set-
square. Also a large pile of felled trees. The teams work
side
by side on top of an artificial hill in an enclosed space which
is
slowly filled with water. With them on the hill are multiple
cages containing pairs of endangered land animals -
orangutans, Amur leopards, Sumatran elephants, tendecks,
black-footed ferrets etc. Each cage has a number on it,
representing the conservational value of the species it
contains. Black-footed ferrets, for instance, might only be
worth two points (because, I mean, they're ferrets), whereas
Sumatran elephants might be worth 15 points. The audience
can phone in for their favourite animals, potentially boosting
their rating and making them more valuable.
Each one-person team must work as fast as they can to
construct their ark. A larger ark can carry more species, but
runs the risk of not being ready in time. Vice versa a
smaller
ark.
As the waters rise, the ark-builders will race to complete
their
arks, and must then bring as many high-scoring species
aboard as possible before they are engulfed. Any animals
not
taken onto an ark will, sadly, perish. Finally, the arks must
float and remain afloat for at least 60 seconds without
capsizing or sinking under their burden of wildlife (Sumatran
elephants don't look so good now, do they?).
In the event that both arks prove to be seaworthy, the
floodwaters are drained away, and a tally is made of the
total
points represented by the surviving animals on each ark.
After the initial rounds of Arkoff, the quarter- semi- and
finals
are played, featuring species which have survived previous
episodes, supplemented with some more challenging ones
such
as a hippos and venomous snakes.
[link]
|
|
" If you build it, they will come ..." |
|
|
Next up, "Wall-off", where a team of one U.S. president has to build a border barrier ... |
|
|
And for the weight shifting competition
programme, can we have Arseoff as a suitable
title? |
|
|
Doubtful - that could cause Noah end of trouble ... |
|
|
This sounds like some sort of themed It's a Knockout special. |
|
|
More like the Eurovision Sink Contest, actually ... |
|
|
Nice , but why a ship?. I envision a televised contest building zoos in a survivalist's bunker. |
|
|
I'm sure I 'd catch a bit while channel switching. |
|
|
//felled trees// That's cheating! The construction site should be on top of a treeless mountain. How the competitors source material should be up to them (no outside human assistance permitted by the rules) |
|
|
I've read that Noah became the first drunk man in history, when he got drunk on the ark. That would add a degree of difficulty to calling Humpheads. |
|
| |